KOMPANIYANING QIYMATINI BAHOLASH: TARIXIY VA NAZARIY ASOSLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14976548Keywords:
xarajatlarni baholash, faoliyat samaradorligi, moliyaviy holatni monitoring qilish, xarajat yondashuvi, daromad yondashuvi, qiyosiy yondashuv, baholash usuli, biznes qiymatiAbstract
Ushbu maqolada zamonaviy iqtisodiyot sharoitida har bir kompaniya uchun har qanday usul va vositalar orqali amalga oshiriladigan moliyaviy-xo‘jalik faoliyati samaradorligini doimiy monitoring qilish muhim ahamiyat kasb etishi. Qolaversa, analitik nuqtai nazardan bunday monitoringning samaradorligi tahlilning muayyan usuli qanday to‘g‘ri tanlanganligi va qo‘llanilishiga bog‘liq ekanligi. Shuningdek, tashkilotning samaradorligi qanchalik yuqori bo‘lsa, tashqi va ichki foydalanuvchilar uchun zarur bo‘lgan ma’lumotlarni o‘z ichiga olgan samarali axborot kompaniyaning moliyaviy holati va boshqaruvning turli darajalarida qabul qilingan qarorlarning samaradorligi shunchalik ishonchli bo‘lishi haqida ilmiy-nazariy qarashlar bayon etilgan
References
1. T.Arumugam “An analysis of discounted cash flow (DCF) approach to business valuation in Sri Lanka” This dissertation submitted to St Clements University as a requirement for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Financial Management. September 2007, page 293.
2. A.Damodaran “Damodaran on Valuation-Security analysis for Investment and Corporate Finance”, Wiley; 2nd edition (August 4, 2006) 704 pages.
3. Zamonaviy korporptiv boshqaruv: Darslik/ S.Elmirzayev. Moliya-iqtisod. 2019 y.262 bet.
4. X.Xudoyqulov “Fond bozori aktivlarini baholash mexanizmini takomillashtirish” mavzusiga PhD dissertasiyasi. Toshkent 2018 yil, 150 b.
5. Домнина С.В., Савоскина Е.В. Модель управления стоимостью бизнеса // Вестник самарского государственного университета. – 2014. – №8 (119). – С. 18- 23.
6. Шохазамий Ш.Ш., Абдураупов Р.Р. Стоимостная концепция финансового управления компанией // Проблемы современной экономики. – 2015. – №1 (53). – С. 143-148.
7. Оценка стоимости предприятия (бизнеса) / А.Г. Грязнова, М.А. Федотова, М.А. Эскиндаров, Т.В. Тазихина, Е.Н. Иванова, О.Н. Щербакова. — М.: ИНТЕРРЕКЛАМА, 2003. - 544 с.
8. Trusculescu A., Draghici A., Albulescu C.T. Key Metrics and Key Drivers in the Valuation of Public Enterprise Resource Planning Companies / Procedia Computer Science, Volume 64, 2015, рр. 917 – 923.
9. Korenkova M., Urbanikova M. Increase of Company Efficiency through the Investment to the Employees and its Quantitative Valuation / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 110, 2014, рр. 942–951.
10. Dagiliene R., Dagiliene L. Accounting-based valuation of innovation: challenges and perspectives / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 156, 2014, рр. 589 – 593.
11. Florin D., Radu-Daniel L. The Impact of Business Intelligence Recognition on Goodwill Valuation / Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 2014, рр. 1779 – 1786.
12. Mjerova J., Kliestik T. Brand valuation as an immanent component of brand value building and managing / Procedia Economics and Finance, Volume 26, 2015, рр. 546 – 552.
Международный стандарт финансовой отчетности (IFRS) 13 “Оценка справедливой стоимости” (в ред. МСФО (IAS) 19, утв. Приказом Минфина России от 18.07.2012 № 106н, с поправками от 17.12.2014 № 151н).
