ESG KONSEPSIYASINING IQTISODIY MOHIYATI, EVOLYUTSIYASI VA IQTISODIYOTDAGI O‘RNI

Authors

  • Abduazimov Umidjon Abduazim o‘g‘li Toshkent davlat iqtisodiyot universiteti mustaqil tadqiqotchisi Author

Keywords:

ESG, CSR, korporativ barqarorlik, moliyaviy natija, materiallik, ESG reytinglari, institutsional investorlar, risk.

Abstract

Maqolada ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) konsepsiyasining iqtisodiy mohiyati va ilmiy evolyutsiyasi “Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar” ro‘yxatidagi o‘nta fundamental tadqiqot asosida qayta tizimlashtirildi. Tadqiqotda korporativ ijtimoiy natijalar va moliyaviy natijalar o‘rtasidagi bog‘liqlik, CSRning strategik mazmuni, barqarorlikning korporativ boshqaruvga integratsiyasi, ESG/CSR materialligi, reytinglar tafovuti, institutsional investorlar ta’siri hamda korporativ risk kanallari qiyosiy-konseptual tahlil qilindi. Mualliflik yondashuviga ko‘ra, ESG ekologik, ijtimoiy va boshqaruv omillarini moliyaviy risk, strategiya, kapital taqsimoti va uzoq muddatli qiymat yaratish bilan bog‘lovchi institutsional-iqtisodiy mexanizm sifatida izohlanadi. O‘zbekiston iqtisodiyoti va bank tizimi uchun ESGni joriy etishda materiallikka asoslangan indikatorlar, strategik boshqaruv, risk-menejment, ma’lumotlar taqqoslanuvchanligi va investorlar bilan muloqot ustuvor yo‘nalishlar sifatida asoslanadi. Maqoladagi xulosalar nazariy-sintez xarakteriga ega bo‘lib, O‘zbekiston bo‘yicha alohida statistik sababiylik da’vosini ilgari surmaydi

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Waddock S. A., Graves S. B. The corporate social performance–financial performance link // Strategic Management Journal. – 1997. – Vol. 18, No. 4. – P. 303–319. – DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G.

2. Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis // Organization Studies. – 2003. – Vol. 24, No. 3. – P. 403–441. – DOI: 10.1177/0170840603024003910.

3. McWilliams A., Siegel D. S., Wright P. M. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications // Journal of Management Studies. – 2006. – Vol. 43, No. 1. – P. 1–18. – DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x.

4. Eccles R. G., Ioannou I., Serafeim G. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance // Management Science. – 2014. – Vol. 60, No. 11. – P. 2835–2857. – DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984.

5. Flammer C. Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach // Management Science. – 2015. – Vol. 61, No. 11. – P. 2549–2568. – DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038.

6. Friede G., Busch T., Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies // Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. – 2015. – Vol. 5, No. 4. – P. 210–233. – DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917.

7. Chatterji A. K., Durand R., Levine D. I., Touboul S. Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers // Strategic Management Journal. – 2016. – Vol. 37, No. 8. – P. 1597–1614. – DOI: 10.1002/smj.2407.

8. Khan M., Serafeim G., Yoon A. Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality // The Accounting Review. – 2016. – Vol. 91, No. 6. – P. 1697–1724. – DOI: 10.2308/accr-51383.

9. Dyck A., Lins K. V., Roth L., Wagner H. F. Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence // Journal of Financial Economics. – 2019. – Vol. 131, No. 3. – P. 693–714. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013.

10. Albuquerque R., Koskinen Y., Zhang C. Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence // Management Science. – 2019. – Vol. 65, No. 10. – P. 4451–4469. – DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043.

11. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. – XV, 383 p.

12. United Nations Global Compact. Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. – New York: United Nations Global Compact, 2004. – 58 p.

13. Principles for Responsible Investment. The Principles for Responsible Investment. – London: PRI Association, 2006. – P. 1–2.

14. United Nations General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Resolution A/RES/70/1. – New York: United Nations, 2015. – 35 p.

15. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Paris Agreement. – Paris: UNFCCC, 2015. – 27 p.

16. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. – Basel: Financial Stability Board, 2017. – 74 p.

17. IFRS Foundation. IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. – London: IFRS Foundation, 2023. – 48 p.

18. IFRS Foundation. IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. – London: IFRS Foundation, 2023. – 54 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-27